JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)January 26, 2006

A- de 2006

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Dario Garzon Garzon

✓
Topic · hard data
Ley 906 De 2004 Articulos 324 Y 362(Parcial). Codigo De Procedimiento Penal. Impedimento Del Procurador General De La Nación Para Conceptuar En El Proceso De La Referencia. Aceptado
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Impedimento Del Procurador General De La Nacion
  • Intervención en la expedición de la norma acusada
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. ACEPTAR el impedimento manifestado por el señor Procurador General de la Nación, Dr. Edgardo Maya Villazón, para conceptuar en el proceso de la referencia.
  2. Segundo. De conformidad con lo dispuesto en el Decreto Ley 262 del 2000 y en armonía con el Decreto 2067 de 1991, ORDENASE a la Secretaría General de la Corte Constitucional que con ocasión del impedimento propuesto, una vez se levante la suspensión decretada, se corra traslado por el término que falte al funcionario designado por el Procurador General de la Nación, para que rinda el concepto de su competencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.